|

Doctor Who - Terror of the Vervoids by
Pip and Jane Baker
Published: February 1988
Edition
read:
Target first, 1988
Coolest
Cover:
Rather like the story itself, Tony Masero’s cover has a certain gaudy
fascination.
Crimes Against Literature:
Either Pip and Jane were subconsciously pitching for Torchwood, or
there are some serious double entendres here, viz:
"Two waxy, olive-green arms were humping the lifeless
Kimber between the inner and outer shells of the space ship’s bulkhead."
(p.85)
"...Mel had headed unerringly for Janet’s cabin in the
crew’s quarters to seek the missing audio tape. Avoiding detection, she
approached a door marked STEWARDESS, and knocked. Getting no reply, she
thought her luck was in."(p.106)
The TARDIS materialises
with..."a
wheezing bellowing and a flashing light"
...and
dematerialises
with..."the
familiar wheezing of dematerialisation". And a bit of On with the
Motley to boot.
Childhood
Recollections:
Quite surprisingly, I appear to have read this one from cover to cover,
although I can’t remember doing so.
Ramblings:
After what feels like a long stretch in Doctor Who’s black and
white years, it’s with something of a jolt that your reviewer found
himself back in Colin Baker’s era, with the first adaptation of one of the
Sixth Doctor’s stories since ‘The Mark of the Rani’ over a year and a half
previously. Having previously failed to complete the Key to Time sequence
due to the absence of ‘The Pirate Planet’, it clearly made sense to
somebody at Target to begin their version of the Trial season in the
middle, although it may simply have been a case of Pip and Jane Baker
finishing their book quicker than Terrance Dicks finished his (and Pip and
Jane knowing that they would be asked to adapt their story and being able
to prepare it as they went). So there’s a curious feeling of
disorientation which comes from reading a story which doesn’t really have
a beginning or an end- it’s like reading ‘The Two Towers’ in isolation or
‘The Empire Strikes Back’ on its own- they make sense up to a certain
point, but if you didn’t know what came before and what followed, you have
to take a lot of the story on trust.
What everybody knows about ‘Terror of the Vervoids’ is
that it’s an attempt to do Murder on the Orient Express in space.
Trouble is, compressing 100 minutes of television into 144 pages of prose,
apart from anything else you lose the visual clues which now have to be
described rather than shown- so for a start, a reader would have to be
particularly dim to miss Grenville/Hallett leaving the ship and disguising
himself as a Mogarian before re-embarking, because we’re taken through the
whole process. It also has to be said that the characters don’t exactly
leap off the page either- the trouble with the Bakers’ twisted and
artificial dialogue is that it doesn’t help to create an impression of
character, although clearly they had less of a Saga cruise in mind as both
Lasky and Rudge are described as somewhat younger than they appeared on
screen. The most challenging part of both the original story and the book
is however the way that the Vervoids, having been given intelligence,
quickly reason that human beings will either destroy or enslave them and
conclude that they have to destroy animal kind out of self-preservation.
It’s a worthwhile idea and a shame that it only crops up towards the end,
not least when the Vervoids look on as the humans and Mogarians kill each
other (a process which is made much clearer in prose than on screen, as
the Bakers are at pains to clarify exactly who killed whom and when).
The Trial scenes, however, have very little impact
because the context isn’t particularly well-evoked- we’re just expected to
take the courtroom, Valeyard and Inquisitor as given- which just
emphasises the peculiarity of adapting this story first. The book’s main
difference from the televised story, however, is one of tone- shorn of a
certain garishness of execution and some rather odd and occasionally
successful casting, what remains is a more even and somewhat less
embarrassing adventure- in fact it’s not difficult to see how the story
might have been cast and directed in the exact opposite way to what the
Bakers intended. Unfortunately, this also means that a lot of the
televised episodes’ bizarre fascination is lost, and while the ripe and
unnatural dialogue remains, we’re denied a lot of the strangeness of
acting and atmosphere which made the original story as seen on television
quite so compelling if not actually very good.
|