
Kinda
"Kinda" came top of TARDIS
magazine's season poll in 1981 you know. Well, it was either top or
bottom, I can't quite remember. Paul Cornell called it the Best Doctor Who
Story Ever in his review of the video in "Dreamwatch". And every comment
on the story has to involve the big rubber snake somewhere, even if only
to point out that it doesn't really matter.
Yet we're still no nearer
knowing whether "Kinda" is the best or the worst story ever. Like Axonite,
it defies analysis. It belongs to the elite club - The Clever Stories. We
don't understand it; therefore it must be smarter than we are. There must
be a message somewhere, something incredibly profound that we can't quite
translate, whether it be written by Kate Bush, some kind of symbolism or
something to do with Buddhism. That's a good one isn't it? Does anyone
actually know anything about Buddhism? Or how a Doctor Who story can
possibly be "about" it (considering that Buddha, whoever he is, failed to
put in an appearance anywhere in TV Who). No. Which is why we cannot
possibly bring this story down. The author has either been incredibly
clever (Dukkha = Doctor) or deftly pulled the wool over our eyes. And as
with anyone who has become dragged into an argument where they know less
about the subject of the debate than their opponent, we have to assume
he's right or else risk looking stupid.
Yet we should really have had
the courage to stick our necks out and berate "Kinda" because it only
works on one level, and we're not entirely sure if it makes any sense on
that one. "Planet of the Spiders" might also have something to say about
Buddhism, but we're more comfortable with that because Jon Pertwee gets to
ride a helicopter thing and there are big spiders everywhere. For those
bothered, there is doubtless some solace to be gathered from the
witterings of Cho-Je, for everyone else it's still a great story. But what
else is "Kinda" about? "Boxes"? It has boxes in it. But then "Ambassadors
of Death" has lots of rockets in it. Is that commenting on the importance
of size over performance? The truth is, it fails to work on any immediate
level because it doesn't make sense. We are expected to feel aglow when
Hindle screams "you can't mend people!", but if the Doctor's expression
suggests he's sussed the importance of this, I'm buggered if I do. Which
people? The Kinda? The missing expedition members? The paper soldiers?
It's symbolism with just the symbols, and no meanings to attach to them.
I suspect there may be more in
the infamous Giant Snake than mere debate over whether it matters or not.
Nobody accepts the Giant Rat in "Talons" as anything other than a failed
bit of costume design, yet frequently the Snake is the main topic of
discussion when talking about "Kinda", which is odd given that this is a
story which apparently has much more to say than most. But discussing a
dodgy monster is something we're far more at home with and less liable to
be shown up about. It's a lot easier than wondering what the "wheel" that
Panna mumbled about actually is, or is a metaphor for. The danger in a
story that's cited to contain lots of symbols and metaphors is that
everything can be passed off as being a clever interpretation of something
else, without us ever knowing why. It's a shame that everything graspable
on a level we can understand - the sets, the monster, the plot - is so
lacking, or we might have been able to enjoy it anyway.
When we're torn between
wondering if it matters or not that the main monster is a big rubber
snake, we're not actually asking this question (this is Doctor Who,
remember). We're asking ourselves if the story can be trusted to stand up
on that extra level we don't fully understand. Has it any worth beyond
what we can see? Because what we can merely see is a bit rubbish looking.
I believe they used to call it the Emperors New Clothes. Sarah Sutton was
quite glad to get out of this one because it meant she could do some
shopping. Quite honestly, who can blame her?
|