
When you have read this article
don't forget to leave feedback
The internet is a place
where people try to sell you things. It has other functions or purported
functions but commerce and the pursuit of money is the driving factor.
Just as the Bible drove the development of printing so making money drives
its successor the internet. But much of that money comes from you and me.
Ordinary people who range from sensible to gullible. The gullible can’t be
helped but the sensible are a little wary of who they give their credit
card details to. As someone who has had their card number stolen and
abused in the past I know how important it is to be careful. The dickless,
faeces chewing, future inhabitants of Hades who took two grand from me and
spent it on shit could’ve been stopped had a simple system of PIN
numbering been introduced. I’ve long thought that PINs for credit cards is
a good idea. But not the system they’ve introduced now. Instead of
entering the same 4 digit number each time, we should be issued with an 8
digit number and be required to enter two or three specified numbers each
time. That way you never ever ever give out all your details at any one
time. It would never be introduced though as people are too lazy to
remember an eight digit number and too stupid to understand what is
expected of them. Or that’s how the card companies think at any rate. But
that’s not what I wanted to talk about. You’ve diverted me from my main
point.
How you decide whether a
website is trustworthy is up to you. SplashDVD went under owing customers
many thousands of pounds. It had a bad reputation but low prices so they
hung on to their solvency a few months longer than they had any right to.
I knew of their reputation from comments posted on various message boards
I frequent. Places like OG may be home to numerous rude, ignorant and
highly inadequate people but the many reasonable and decent posters the
board has make it a source of some useful knowledge. Splash was a place I
was warned off and warned off I stayed. I pretty much limit myself to the
big names – Amazon, Play, Blackstar (now Sendit.com) and my bookclub. And
eBay of course.
Finally I reach my point.
Buying from other ordinary people via eBay, Amazon and so on. The eBay and
Amazon names are strong – perhaps the two strongest brand names in all of
e-commerce – but they have no control over the ordinary peeps who sell
through them. That is where feedback comes in. Feedback is where buyers
and sellers can rate each other. Bad customers can be flagged, reliable
people can be spotlighted. Purchases on eBay carry a responsibility to
give feedback. It’s not the law but it is expected of you. Emails come
from your business interlocutor saying "I’ll give you feedback if you give
me feedback". In a sense no one wants to go first. They want to give
feedback based on what you said about them. If you said they were great,
they will say you were great. If you point out some small defect then they
will be equally picky in return. Of course, you can’t both go second so a
game of chicken commences. That is if you take it seriously. If you are an
eBay addict who has rules about bidding at the last possible second.
Someone who runs their lives around end of auction times and who has
probably memorised their ratings by heart. They are reluctant to answer to
their own name as they spent most of their lives being known by their
login. They know all the tricks that are supposed to make their auctions
stand out from the others. They describe everything as "RARE!!!" or
preface every description with "LOOK!!!". When they have spare minutes
between end-of-auctions they discuss eBay tips and tactics with others
like themselves on the eBay forums. Such places exist.
At Amazon’s Marketplace the
system is slightly less serious. I’d say about a third of all the people
I’ve sold to have left marks out of five. Only one gave me less than five
stars and that was because I was fine but he didn’t like the thing I’d
sold him as much as he’d hoped. Blame the writer, the stars or the
producers but don’t blame me. When I first started selling things I
worried about getting bad feedback. I still do but at least now I’ve got a
cushion of good ratings to make any blip look like the abortion it is.
It can be interesting to
read peoples feedback when you’re considering buying from them. Naturally
you ignore the good scores and have a look for the bad ones. People can be
so unreasonable. I’ve seen 1/5 ratings given because videos weren’t
delivered within two days during a national postal strike. And I thought
my guy who didn’t like what he’d bought was bad.
All of the above, written
as I usually do off the top of my head with no prep, is to get to this
point. I mentioned some months ago the book "Greatest of All Time" – a
huge book about Muhammad Ali. It costs a staggering two thousand pounds
for the standard version (though that entitles you to free Super Saver
shipping so you’ve saved yourself three quid). I thought nothing could be
more absurd than that (except of course the deluxe version which was
selling for ten thousand dollars) until I returned to look at it today and
saw that copies were available via Amazon Marketplace. Would they, I
wondered, have "unwanted gift" copies for sale? Were there really people
who would chance two grand on a book and decide they didn’t like it? How
much discount would be available? Then I found what I was looking for.
Seller : wluk14
Price : £1,500
Feedback rating :
2/5
Item description :
absolutely brand new - i know i have had bad feedback before but i will
quarantee you will get this limited special edition book within a week at
a fraction of the amazon price!
Feedback comments :
1 out of 5:
"still haven't received item and hasn't
replied to any e-mails",
1 out of 5: "DO NOT BUY FROM
THIS SELLER!!!!!!! has not contacted me and no product recieved",
1 out of 5:
"Took 2 weeks to arrive, poorly
packaged & not in "as new" condition advertised",
5 out of 5:
"Video was dispatched promptly, was of
good quality, and included a helpful note."
Would you, or any sane
person, give this man fifteen hundred pounds? I thought not. Even for
something that could possibly be worth that much.
But who is more foolish –
the dubious character offering a suspicious discount as annoyed customers
bang on his door demanding satisfaction or those who are selling "used"
copies of the book for a hundred pounds or more ABOVE the Amazon price?
And they don’t even qualify
for free super saver shipping.
Alex Parks (and those
inferior performers who went before her) was right when she sang that it
is a "Mad World".
|