"The Pink Panther"
It’s the one with... the fancy dress party at the end.
1962’s "The Pink Panther" was supposed to be a simple
light comedy crime caper pitting Peter Ustinov’s bungling detective
against David Niven’s suave thief. It became something very different.
Ustinov’s pulled out and the internationally unknown Peter Sellers
replaced him. This new imbalance between the leads meant Sellers had to
fight harder for screen time than Ustinov would’ve and he was able to make
every moment count. The bulk of the film sees Niven wooing the Princess –
owner of the infamous Pink Panther diamond (so called because it is flawed
and if you hold it up to the light you are supposed to be able to see a
leaping panther). We know Sir Charles Litton is the notorious "Phantom",
Clouseau knows he is the notorious Phantom and even the princess seems to
have more than an inkling that Sir Charles can’t be trusted.
Clouseau, meanwhile, goes from place to place falling
over things, having doors opened in his face and generally missing most of
the obvious. His wife is having an affair with Sir Chales but to Clouseau
she is an angel. One who can save enough out of the housekeeping to buy
fur coats. His domestic relations do provide the funniest moments when,
straight out of a Brian Rix farce, she tries to stop Clouseau finding both
Sir Charles and his nephew hiding in their bedroom.
The climax of the film is a triumph. Whatever the rest
may lack in incident and high comedy is more than made up for in the
princess’s magnificent fancy dress ball. Two gorillas attempt to steal the
diamond, Clouseau goes about the place in a suit of armour, they actually
make a pantomime horse funny and when Clouseau sets off all the fireworks
at once you think the film must’ve peaked. But no – there is the best car
chase in all of cinema history to come. They tack on a court room ending
(which is forgotten in later films as Clouseau is convicted of being the
notorious Phantom) but even that has John Le Mesurier in it so isn’t a
complete waste of time.
Overall, it is a film that is worth sticking with
because the payoff more than justifies the rather tedious middle of the
movie.

"A Shot in the Dark"
It’s the one where… Clouseau gets out of his car and
falls into the fountain.
A Shot in the Dark has a curious production history.
Originally not intended to feature Clouseau it was based on a play and
would’ve been a standalone movie. But various people liked Sellers’
performance in The Pink Panther and he was added to the rewritten movie.
Trivia fact – the co-writer was the man who would later write The
Exorcist. The two films were shot pretty much back to back and A Shot in
the Dark was released only a few months after The Pink Panther.
Sellers is at the fore for the first time as Clouseau
and he is magnificent. Even though the old props – Dreyfuss, Kato and the
the comic violence which followed from both – all debuted in this movie,
it doesn’t feel as cartoony as later entries. Sellers is pompous and
ridiculous but never feels like an outsider. He is part of this world in a
way he never would be again. He is even vaguely believable as a detective
– his hunch that Maria is innocent turns out to be entirely right (even if
he believes it because he fancies her not because he has any actual
evidence). The film’s running gag – Clouseau keeps releasing her from jail
and is arrested every time he tries following her – works extremely well.
The siren used by the police van has stayed in my head for the twenty odd
years since I first heard it. It is is the perfect comedy siren.
Things take a turn for the worse when they pay a visit
to a nudist colony. I once ranted that "Confetti" had nudism but didn’t
bother to try and make it funny. A Shot in the Dark uses every nudist
colony comedy device it can get its hands on. It isn’t terribly funny but
at least they tried. A few years later and it would’ve been shot in a
tawdry and titillating way which would’ve been much worse. Once you show
the bits, you can never again get laughs from not showing them.
The film climaxes with the revelation of who is the
killer. I won't spoil it but it is as good an ending as you could’ve
expected from a spoof of the genre. Blake Edwards was no Agatha Christie
and yet the ending was clearly dreamed up by someone who knew the genre
well enough to replicate it.
It was the high watermark of the series – later films
would aim for bigger laughs but none of them would have the consistency of
A Shot in the Dark.

"Inspector Clouseau"
It's the one without... Peter Sellers
Now here’s a rarity. The studio wanted a new Clouseau
film following the success of the first two. The only snags were that
Peter Sellers refused and Blake Edwards refused. Which is a bit of an
irony considering the two fell out so badly during A Shot in the Dark that
they refused to ever work together again. Inspector Clouseau would go into
production without either of its essential elements. Alan Arkin was cast
as Clouseau in a film which ultimately had Edwards’ blessing but no direct
involvement. So in that regards it is more "On Her Majesty’s Secret
Service" rather than "Never Say Never Again".
The film is rarely seen and most people don’t even know
it exists. If they ever sort out the rights and release a complete Pink
Panther set ("Return" is currently owned by someone else and thus is
always released on its own) I doubt Inspector Clouseau would be included.
It doesn’t look like a Pink Panther film, it doesn’t feature the famous
panther in its opening titles for one thing, and it doesn’t feel like one.
The cast is made up of British comedy stalwarts – Frank Finlay, Beryl
Reid, Patrick Cargill and so on. It more closely resembles any one of the
generic British comedy films of the late 1960s.
Arkin’s performance is usually regarded as pretty good.
He is, to my mind, comparable to George Lazenby in the aforementioned
OHMSS – sitting as he does between the early Sellers (Connery) and the
late Sellers (Moore). Arkin’s accent is heavier than Sellers’ 60s accent
but no where near as strong as the 70s version. He plays Clouseau with
more arrogance than Sellers had to this point. This is the beginning of
Clouseau’s belief that he is the greatest detective in the world.
With the later films becoming influenced by the James
Bond franchise, it is a little surprising that they never followed up this
film’s use of Bond style gadgets. Scotland Yard give Clouseau a belt
buckle which fires bullets, a mini-tape recorder the size of a shoe box
and a cigarette lighter with a built in laser. Hilarity ensues as each of
these goes wrong in turn and one can only imagine what Sellers could’ve
done with a fresh set of gadgets in each film. The closest he came was his
disguises and they became tiresome so maybe it is a good thing.
There is also a rather blatant piece of product
placement as the stolen money is smuggled out in bars of Lindt chocolate.
Cue lots of close-ups of Lindt bars, Lindt trucks, miscellaneous Lindt
logos, lots of mentions of Lindt in news bulletins and lots of people
buying or stealing Lindt products because they think they contain bundles
of cash.
The forgotten film is worth seeing only as a curiosity.
The funniest bit is Clouseau playing a child’s game with Frank Finlay on
the train and the pair of them becoming increasingly petulant as they
believe the other is cheating. Arkin gives a good performance but, as good
as he is, he isn’t you know who. It’s more for fans of late 60s British
comedy than fans of the Pink Panther
